Project Canterbury

Assertio Septem Sacramentorum,
Or Defense of the Seven Sacraments

by King Henry VIII

New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benziger, 1908

transcribed by
the Revd Ed Renner
AD 2001


CHAP. II
Of the Pope's Authority
Papatus est robusta Venatio, Romani Pontificis

INDEED it is no ridiculous Desire in him, to wish the Things he writ before should be burned; because many of them deserved it; yet much more this Proposition, which he desires may be preserved after the rest are burned, as if worthy of Eternity. What Man, if he had not known his Malice, but would have admired his Inconstancy in this Place? For first, he denied the Pope's Supremacy to be of divine Bight, or Law, but allowed it to be of human Bight: But now, (contrary to himself) he affirms it to be of neither of them; but that the Papacy, by mere Force has assumed, and usurped Tyranny. Formerly he was of Opinion, That Power was given to Roman Bishops over the Universal Church by human Consent and for the public Good: And so much was he of that Opinion, that he detested the Schism of the Bohemia, who denied any Obedience to the See of Rome; saying, That they sinned damnably who did not obey the Pope: Having written these Things so little Time before, he now embraces what then he detested. The like Stability he has in this: That after he preached, in a Sermon to the People, That Excommunication is a Medicine, and to be suffered with Patience and Obedience; he himself, being (for every good Cause,) a while after excommunicated, was so impatient of that Sentence, that (mad with Rage) he breaks forth into insupportable Contumelies., Reproaches and Blasphemies: So that by his Fury, it plainly appears, that those who are driven from the Bosom of their Holy Mother the Church, are immediately seized, and possessed with Furies , and tormented by Devils. But I ask this; he that saw these Things so short a while since, how is it that he becomes of Opinion, that then he saw Nothing at all? What new Eyes has he got? Is his Sight more sharp, after he has joined Anger to his wonted Pride, and has added Hatred to both? Does he see farther with these so excellent Spectacles?

I will. not wrong the Bishop of Rome so much, as troublesomely, or carefully to dispute his Right, as if it were a Matter doubtful; it is sufficient for my present Task, that the Enemy is so much led by Fury, that he destroys his own Credit, and makes clearly appear, that by mere Malice he is so blinded, that he neither sees, nor knows what he says himself. For he cannot deny, but that all the Faithful honour and acknowledge the sacred Roman See for their Mother and Supreme, nor does Distance of Place or Dangers in the Way hinder Access thereunto. For if those who come hither from the Indies tell us Truth, the Indians themselves (separated from us by such a vast Distance, both of Land and Sea,) do submit to the See of Rome. If the Bishop of Rome has got this large Power, neither by Command of God, nor the Will of Man, but by main Force; I would fain know of Luther, when the Pope rushed into the Possession of so great Riches? for so vast a Power, (especially if it begun in the Memory of Man,) cannot have an obscure Origin. But perhaps he will say, it is above one or two Ages since; let him then point out the Time by Histories: Otherwise, if it be so antient that the Beginning of so great a Thing is quite forgot; let him . know, that, by all Laws, we are forbidden to think otherwise, than that Thing had a lawful Beginning, which so far surpasses the Memory of Man, that its Origin cannot be known. It is certain, that, by the unanimous Consent of all Nations, it is forbidden to change, or move the Things which have been for a long Time immoveable. Truly, if any will look upon antient Monuments, or read the Histories of former Times, he may easily find, that since the Conversion of the World, all Churches in the Christian World have been obedient to the See of Rome. We find, that, though the Empire was translated to the Grecians, yet did they still own, and obey the Supremacy of the Church, and See of Rome, except when they were in any turbulent Schism.

St. Hierome

excellently well demonstrates his good Esteem for the Roman See, when he openly declares, (though he was no Roman himself,) that it was sufficient for him that the Pope of Rome did but approve his Faith, whoever else should disapprove it.

When Luther so impudently asserts, and that against his former Sentence,) That the Pope has no Kind of Right over the Catholic Church; no, not so much as human; but has by mere Force tyrannically usurped it; I cannot but admire, that he should expect his Readers should be so easily induced to believe his Words; or so blockish, as to think that a Priest, without any Weapon, or Company to defend him, (as doubtless he was, before he enjoyed that which Luther says he usurped,) could ever expect or hope, without any Right or Title, to obtain so great a Command over so many Bishops, his Fellows, in so many different, and divers Nations. How could he expect, I say, that any Body would believe, (as I know not how he could desire they should,) that all Nations, Cities, nay Kingdoms and Provinces, should be so prodigal of their Rights and Liberties, as to acknowledge the Superiority of a strange Priest, to whom they should owe no Subjection? But what signifies it to know the Opinion of Luther in this Case, when (through Anger and Malice,) he himself is ignorant of his own Opinion, or what he thinks? But he manifestly discovers the Darkness of his Understanding and Knowledge, and the Folly and Blindness of his Heart, abandoned to a reprobate Sense, in doing and saying Things so inconsistent. How true is that saying of the Apostle? Though I have Prophecy, and understand all Mysteries, and all Knowledge; and though I have all Faith, so as to remove Mountains, and have not Charity, I am Nothing. Of which Charity Luther not only shews, how void he is, by perishing himself through Fury; but much more by endeavouring to draw all others with him into Destruction, whilst he strives to dissuade them from their Obedience to the Chief Bishop, whom, in a three-fold Manner, he himself is bound to obey, viz. as a Christian, as a Priest, and as a religious Brother; his Disobedience also deserving to be punished in a treble Manner: He remembers not how much Obedience is better than Sacrifice; not does he consider how it is ordained in Deuteronomy, That the Man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the Priest, (that stands to minister there before the Lord thy God,) or unto the Judge, even that Man shall die: He considers not, I say, what cruel Punishment he deserves, that will not obey the chief Priest and supreme Judge upon Earth. For this poor Brother, being cited to appear before the Pope, with Offers to pay his Expences, and Promise of safe Conduct; he refuses to go without a Guard; troubling the whole Church as much as he could, and exciting the whole Body to rebel against the Head; which to do, is as the Sin of Witchcraft; and in whom to acquiesce, is as the Sin of Idolatry. Seeing therefore that Luther, (moved by Hatred) runs head-long on to Destruction, and refuses to submit to the Law of God, but desires to establish a Law of his own; it behoves all Christians to beware, lest (as the Apostle says) through the Disobedience of one, many be made Sinners; but on the contrary, by hating and detesting his Wickedness, we may sing with the Prophet, I hated the wicked, and loved your Law.


Project Canterbury